Verzending van voorraadartikelen binnen 1 dagMinimaal 3 jaar garantieGratis deskundige ondersteuning van gediplomeerde ingenieursVolumekortingenNetto 30 voor bedrijven
ConfigurerenConfigureer een systeem
NL
EnglishFrançaisEspañolDeutschItalianoPortuguêsNederlandsSvenska日本語한국어简体中文
Offerte
Home / Case studies / Bent pins on connectors and boards
Application study · Electronics assembly

Finding bent pins on connectors and boards with telecentric backlighting

A pin that leans by a few degrees still looks fine from above and fails at the press-fit. Three tests with bi-telecentric lenses show pin rows as clean silhouettes, so angle and position come straight from the edges.

Separate real pin lean from perspective.

  • Gezichtsveld50.46 × 37.85 mm
  • Image2592 × 1944 px
  • Accuracy (as tested)< 0.019 mm
  • Board test60.02 × 45.02 mm, < 0.023 mm
3D view of the inspection set-up: camera, lens, light and partDrag to rotate · scroll to zoom
3D illustration · real CAD where available
Walk through this setup 5 guided stops
From component to inspection

Understand each choice.

Choose a stop to frame the part in 3D and see why it belongs in this setup. The component notes and links remain available if 3D cannot load.

Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Lens and light envelopes use printed dimensions. The linked station uses its published base size and column height; carriage, brackets, fittings, parts and spacing are illustrative. Confirm load, travel, fasteners and clearances before ordering. Light paths explain the arrangement and do not simulate optical performance.

From the demo to your test bench

Build around the parts you can buy.

Explore each component, check its specifications and compare alternatives. The proposed quote includes the linked test station; its catalog listing includes two lighting holders.

Mount the optics with intent

The station is an optical test bench, with its two lighting holders included in the catalog listing. The 3D column and base follow the published height and footprint. Carriages, clamps and part supports are schematic: confirm camera screw pattern, lens support, light fasteners, permissible load and actual travel before ordering.

Configure the mounting station →

Complete the electrical system

Select a controller against the exact light voltage, drive mode and power, then confirm camera data/power/I/O cables and a suitable PC. These are not silently added to the proposed optical kit.

Optics application-lab test sheet

Evidence you can inspect

Visible in the images

The three captures show backlit pin outlines, including visibly leaning pins.

What the source reports

The sheets report <0.019 mm, <0.023 mm and <0.04 mm for different camera/field combinations.

How to use this evidence

The camera and AL lens in the proposed board kit are alternatives. Validate their sampling and field on your fixture.

What the camera saw

Cropped from the source test sheet; original test annotations are retained. Captures are not generated or enhanced. Drag the comparison slider or use the image buttons.

Board-header camera capture: pin outlines and visibly leaning pins under a backlight. The source names the non-AL LS-VCM230-120.
Board-header camera capture: pin outlines and visibly leaning pins under a backlight. The source names the non-AL LS-VCM230-120.
A row of connectors over a flat backlight (LS-VCM125-64-AL): high contrast with an even background across the field.
A row of connectors over a flat backlight (LS-VCM125-64-AL): high contrast with an even background across the field.
Machined-part pin capture from the vertically mounted test; source lens LS-VCM110-120 with collimated illumination.
Machined-part pin capture from the vertically mounted test; source lens LS-VCM110-120 with collimated illumination.

The challenge

Pins are thin, shiny and close together. Lit from the front they flare and merge; seen through a standard lens, pins at the edge of the image lean outwards (parallax), which looks exactly like the bend you are trying to find.

The check has to measure the pin tip position and the lean of every pin across the whole row in one image.

How it was solved

Connector row: LS-VCM125-64-AL (0.113x) over a flat backlight. Field 50.46 × 37.85 mm at 2592 × 1944 px, accuracy under 0.019 mm.

Board header pins: the sheet identifies the LS-VCM230-120 with a backlight, a 60.02 × 45.02 mm field, and reports <0.023 mm. The current AL lens below is a proposed alternative rather than the exact named test lens.

Pins on a machined part: the source names the LS-VCM110-120 and a collimated light, mounted vertically. It reports an 81.62 × 81.62 mm field at 2048 × 2048 pixels and <0.04 mm.

Why it works

  1. 1

    Telecentric optics reduce perspective differences across the field, helping distinguish pin lean from imaging geometry.

  2. 2

    Backlighting separates the pin outlines from the background, providing edges for a position or angle check.

  3. 3

    The quoted values belong to three separate test configurations. One proposed kit does not reproduce every test field or performance.

From image contrast to a production decision

What to validate on your part

A useful sample image is the starting point. These are the checks that turn the concept into a defensible inspection.

  1. 01

    Define the reject

    Specify tip displacement, lean angle and the smallest gap that must remain visible.

  2. 02

    Test the complete row

    Check edge-of-field pins and pins at different depths and heights.

  3. 03

    Include fixture motion

    Repeat loading and triggering with good and deliberately bent samples.

Explore your inspection requirements

How many pixels cover your feature?

Compare feature coverage, camera pixel requirements and exposure using your own planning inputs. These are calculated planning values, not inspection results or an accuracy specification.

Editable planning scenario. Adjust these example inputs for your application; they are separate from the source test and 3D setup. Motion allowance and target coverage are starting points to validate, not acceptance limits. Pixel count starts from the proposed camera's catalog resolution.

Object sampling0.04085 mm/px
Pixels across feature12.24 px
Horizontal pixels for target1000 px
Motion during exposure0.2448 px
Exposure ceiling from motion204.2 µs
Formulas and assumptions

The field, feature, speed and exposure start with neutral example values. They are not taken from the source test or the 3D illustration. Allowed motion starts at an editable 0.5-pixel example; it is not a recommended acceptance limit. Target coverage starts at an editable 5-pixel example; it is not a recommended detection or measurement threshold. The horizontal pixel count starts from the catalog Resolution row for MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE). Use the effective width after cropping, binning or decimation if those modes are enabled.

  • Object sampling (mm/px) = field width (mm) / horizontal pixels.
  • Pixels across feature = feature width (mm) / object sampling (mm/px).
  • Horizontal pixels for target = field width (mm) × target pixels across feature / feature width (mm), rounded up to a whole pixel.
  • Motion (px) = speed (mm/s) × exposure (µs) / 1,000,000 / object sampling (mm/px).
  • Exposure for allowed motion (µs) = allowed motion (px) × object sampling (mm/px) / speed (mm/s) × 1,000,000.

The exposure result is the maximum duration from this motion allowance alone. At zero speed, motion sets no exposure limit; the camera, lighting, saturation and other constraints still apply. A shorter exposure does not itself guarantee a reliable inspection.

Field width and feature width refer to the same object plane. The motion calculation assumes uniform linear motion parallel to the field-width direction and a single exposure. It does not model perspective, vibration, rolling-shutter distortion, diffraction, defocus or optical distortion. A strobe may change the effective exposure.

The target result is a horizontal sampling requirement, not a camera recommendation or a change to the selected camera. It uses the effective image width after cropping, binning or decimation and does not determine the vertical resolution or sensor size. Pixel coverage alone does not establish detectability or measurement accuracy. Validate contrast, lens performance, working distance, illumination, calibration, camera exposure limits and the inspection algorithm on representative parts. Changing field width does not change the 3D model or certify that the proposed lens can achieve that field.

The set-up and the parts

Cameras (tests)5 MP 2592 × 1944 px; 4 MP 2048 × 2048 px (1")
ObjectievenBi-telecentric 0.113x / 0.095x / 0.138x
LichtbronnenFlat backlight; collimated light
Werkafstand187 mm / 280 mm / 280 mm (lens specs)
Mounting (proposed)LS-BT-XZ-G-8-6045 · camera test station with glass tray and two lighting holders

"Tested" identifies the part named in the source. "Our pick" is a proposed alternative or supporting part. The quote includes only cards marked "In proposed setup", with the quantities shown; other test arrangements are separate. Confirm colour, optics, controllers, power supplies, cables and mounting before ordering.

About this case study: the photos and camera images come from the application laboratory of the maker of the lighting and optics we sell, imaged on the parts shown; your results depend on your part, camera and set-up. This is an application-lab study, not a LumaSpec customer deployment. Source figures are reported results; proposed components require a fresh trial. The 3D scene illustrates the arrangement and does not simulate imaging performance.

More case studies

Start with your inspection requirement

Make the next trial specific.

Tell us the part size, smallest defect or tolerance, available working distance, material and line speed. Include what a good part and a reject look like.

Discuss your applicationConfigureer een systeem