MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE)View part & specifications →Browse camera options →Metal-column edges: trade brightness for a cleaner silhouette boundary
The real side-by-side source image shows a softer boundary under an ordinary backlight and a sharper-looking edge under a collimated panel. The collimated background is dimmer; more brightness is not automatically a better gauging image.
Choose the backlight for edge stability rather than brightness alone.
- Proposed light housing (spec)84 × 84 × 19 mm
- EvidenceReal application-lab captures
- Camera (proposed)2448 × 2048 monochrome
- Field (derived proposal)33.78 × 28.26 mm derived from printed 0.25x magnification
Drag to rotate · scroll to zoomWalk through this setup 5 guided stops
Understand each choice.
Choose a stop to frame the part in 3D and see why it belongs in this setup. The component notes and links remain available if 3D cannot load.
MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE)
Proposed 5 MP monochrome global-shutter camera, 2448 × 2048 pixels at 3.45 µm, C-mount. The source camera is unidentified. This NPOE model requires separate power and does not support PoE.
LS-KF3528M-ML
35 mm C-mount macro lens. Its printed 0.25x / 150 mm working-distance pair gives a derived 33.78 × 28.26 mm field on the proposed camera. Confirm focus, coverage and the actual part plane.
LS-4PFT7070
Exact white source collimated panel;84 × 84 × 19 mm housing and 70 × 70 mm emitting area.
LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045
600 mm column, 600 × 450 mm breadboard, glass tray and two lighting holders. Proposed bench fixture; actual load, travel, clamps, mounting fasteners and light clearance must be confirmed.
Follow the contrast to the part.
Choose the backlight for edge stability rather than brightness alone.
Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Light envelopes and the station base/height use printed dimensions. Part shapes, brackets, holders, shielding and spacing are illustrative; they are not reconstructions of a source part or a complete mechanically validated assembly. Light paths explain the proposed arrangement and do not simulate optical performance. The proposed field is derived from the printed camera pixel dimensions and the stated lens magnification/working-distance pair, not measured from the source capture. The camera shows a local silhouette-edge window, not the complete cylinder. The source does not supply the actual part dimensions.
Build around the parts you can buy.
Explore each component, check its specifications and compare alternatives. The proposed quote includes the linked test station; its catalog listing includes two lighting holders.
MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE)View part & specifications →Browse camera options →
LS-KF3528M-MLView part & specifications →Browse imaging lens options →
LS-4PFT7070View part & specifications →Browse inspection light options →
LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045View part & specifications →Browse test station & mounts options →Mount the optics with intent
The station is an optical test bench, with its two lighting holders included in the catalog listing. The 3D column and base follow the published height and footprint. Carriages, clamps and part supports are schematic: confirm camera screw pattern, lens support, light fasteners, permissible load and actual travel before ordering.
Configure the mounting station →Complete the electrical system
Select a controller against the exact light voltage, drive mode and power, then confirm camera data/power/I/O cables and a suitable PC. These are not silently added to the proposed optical kit.
Evidence you can inspect
The collimated-light side shows a more distinct boundary while its background is dimmer.
The source describes reduced virtual border in a column-diameter application, without measured uncertainty or a numerical accuracy result.
An application-lab lighting demonstration, not a customer deployment or a qualified production inspection. Proposed camera, lens, fixture and scene spacing require a fresh trial. Source observations do not establish a defect-size limit, accuracy guarantee or production false-call rate.
What the camera saw
Cropped from the source test sheet; original test annotations are retained. Captures are not generated or enhanced. Drag the comparison slider or use the image buttons.

Ordinary backlightRetroiluminação colimadaCollimated backlight: Original collimated-panel side: dimmer background and a more distinct outline boundary.
The challenge
A thick round part can collect stray light around its edge. That apparent border can shift the edge selected by a measurement algorithm.
How it was solved
The source compares white LS-4FT7070 with white LS-4PFT7070 on a metal-column diameter application. The latter is the proposed light.
The source gives no camera, image scale or measurement method. The camera, macro lens and station below are a new bench proposal, with a local outline region rather than a guaranteed diameter tolerance.
Why it works
- 1
A more directional transmitted field can reduce light wrapping around the boundary of a thick part.
- 2
The source reports less virtual border but supplies no numerical accuracy. A sharper-looking edge must still be calibrated and tested across real height, focus and part variation.
What to validate on your part
A useful sample image is the starting point. These are the checks that turn the concept into a defensible inspection.
- 01
Define the physical edge
Set the diameter datum and edge-fitting rule before comparing apparent borders.
- 02
Calibrate and reload
Use a reference artefact and repeat loading, focus and allowed height variation.
- 03
Compare usable contrast
Adjust exposure without saturation and quantify edge stability, not background brightness alone.
How many pixels cover your feature?
Compare feature coverage, camera pixel requirements and exposure using your own planning inputs. These are calculated planning values, not inspection results or an accuracy specification.
Editable planning scenario. Adjust these example inputs for your application; they are separate from the source test and 3D setup. Motion allowance and target coverage are starting points to validate, not acceptance limits. Pixel count starts from the proposed camera's catalog resolution.
Enter finite numbers in every field. Field width, feature width, target coverage, exposure and allowed motion must be greater than zero; horizontal pixel count must be a positive whole number; material speed may be zero. Use values within the supported numeric range if a calculation cannot be represented.
Formulas and assumptions
The field, feature, speed and exposure start with neutral example values. They are not taken from the source test or the 3D illustration. Allowed motion starts at an editable 0.5-pixel example; it is not a recommended acceptance limit. Target coverage starts at an editable 5-pixel example; it is not a recommended detection or measurement threshold. The horizontal pixel count starts from the catalog Resolution row for MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE). Use the effective width after cropping, binning or decimation if those modes are enabled.
- Object sampling (mm/px) = field width (mm) / horizontal pixels.
- Pixels across feature = feature width (mm) / object sampling (mm/px).
- Horizontal pixels for target = field width (mm) × target pixels across feature / feature width (mm), rounded up to a whole pixel.
- Motion (px) = speed (mm/s) × exposure (µs) / 1,000,000 / object sampling (mm/px).
- Exposure for allowed motion (µs) = allowed motion (px) × object sampling (mm/px) / speed (mm/s) × 1,000,000.
The exposure result is the maximum duration from this motion allowance alone. At zero speed, motion sets no exposure limit; the camera, lighting, saturation and other constraints still apply. A shorter exposure does not itself guarantee a reliable inspection.
Field width and feature width refer to the same object plane. The motion calculation assumes uniform linear motion parallel to the field-width direction and a single exposure. It does not model perspective, vibration, rolling-shutter distortion, diffraction, defocus or optical distortion. A strobe may change the effective exposure.
The target result is a horizontal sampling requirement, not a camera recommendation or a change to the selected camera. It uses the effective image width after cropping, binning or decimation and does not determine the vertical resolution or sensor size. Pixel coverage alone does not establish detectability or measurement accuracy. Validate contrast, lens performance, working distance, illumination, calibration, camera exposure limits and the inspection algorithm on representative parts. Changing field width does not change the 3D model or certify that the proposed lens can achieve that field.
The set-up and the parts
| Source camera | Not identified in the source sheet |
|---|---|
| Camera and lens | Proposed catalog components |
| Proposed field | 33.78 × 28.26 mm derived from printed 0.25x magnification |
| Lens-to-part in proposed scene | 150 mm; printed working-distance pair |
| Mounting (proposed) | LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045 · catalog test station with two lighting holders |
| Coverage of proposed field | Local silhouette-edge window; whole-column dimensions and coverage are not asserted |

Exact white source collimated panel;84 × 84 × 19 mm housing and 70 × 70 mm emitting area.
$99.00In proposed setup
Ordinary white backlight named in the source comparison; excluded from the proposed kit.
$99.00Separate test / alternative
Proposed 5 MP monochrome global-shutter camera, 2448 × 2048 pixels at 3.45 µm, C-mount. The source camera is unidentified. This NPOE model requires separate power and does not support PoE.
$819.00In proposed setup
35 mm C-mount macro lens. Its printed 0.25x / 150 mm working-distance pair gives a derived 33.78 × 28.26 mm field on the proposed camera. Confirm focus, coverage and the actual part plane.
$339.00In proposed setup
600 mm column, 600 × 450 mm breadboard, glass tray and two lighting holders. Proposed bench fixture; actual load, travel, clamps, mounting fasteners and light clearance must be confirmed.
$359.00In proposed setup"Tested" identifies the part named in the source. "Our pick" is a proposed alternative or supporting part. The quote includes only cards marked "In proposed setup", with the quantities shown; other test arrangements are separate. Confirm colour, optics, controllers, power supplies, cables and mounting before ordering.
About this case study: the photos and camera images come from the application laboratory of the maker of the lighting and optics we sell, imaged on the parts shown; your results depend on your part, camera and set-up. This is an application-lab study, not a LumaSpec customer deployment. Source figures are reported results; proposed components require a fresh trial. The 3D scene illustrates the arrangement and does not simulate imaging performance.
More case studies


Screw thread pitch with telecentric optics
Stabilize scale and edge contrast before judging a tolerance.
- Campo de visão19.34 × 16.21 mm
- Image2456 × 2058 px


Bent pins on connectors and boards
Separate real pin lean from perspective.
- Campo de visão50.46 × 37.85 mm
- Image2592 × 1944 px


Stamped-metal terminal contours
Use a silhouette when the requirement is shape.
- Test lightWhite thin-panel backlight
- Housing (spec)140 × 140 × 9.5 mm
Make the next trial specific.
Tell us the part size, smallest defect or tolerance, available working distance, material and line speed. Include what a good part and a reject look like.
Discuss your applicationConfigurar um sistema