Metal inserts: keep reflective faces and their boundaries distinct
Two rectangular metal faces appear bright against a dark carrier in the supplied square-light capture. This is a useful image for an outline or presence trial before a calibrated measurement system is chosen.
A clear metal outline is the start of a measurement trial, not its accuracy result.
Real camera capture
- Proposed light housing (spec)96 × 96 × 30 mm
- EvidenceReal application-lab captures
- Camera (proposed)2448 × 2048 monochrome
- Field (derived proposal)84.46 × 70.66 mm derived from printed 0.1x magnification
Explore it in 3D
Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Light envelopes and the station base/height use printed dimensions. Part shapes, brackets, holders, shielding and spacing are illustrative; they are not reconstructions of a source part or a complete mechanically validated assembly. Light paths explain the proposed arrangement and do not simulate optical performance. The proposed field is derived from the printed camera pixel dimensions and the stated lens magnification/working-distance pair, not measured from the source capture.
Lighting application-lab image sheet
What the camera saw
Cropped from the source test sheet; original test annotations are retained. Captures are not generated or enhanced. Drag a comparison slider, or open any image full size.
The challenge
Reflective metal faces and a dark fixture create a useful contrast opportunity, but uneven highlights can blur the boundary or create false edges inside the face.
How it was solved
The source identifies white LS-SDL-0005. Its source drawing has a 30 × 30 mm rear camera opening, distinct from the 93 × 93 mm emitting area.
The proposed setup raises the light above the part so the viewing cone fits the rear opening. That spacing is a proposed bench arrangement; the source does not state its working distance.
Why it works
- 1
Diffuse light around the part helps separate the bright rectangular faces from the dark carrier.
- 2
The source calls the task contour measurement but supplies no scale, uncertainty or repeated measurement. Visible edges alone do not establish gauging accuracy.
Lighting application-lab image sheet
Evidence you can inspect
Two bright rectangular faces have visible boundaries against the surrounding dark carrier.
The source reports clear metal contours; no calibrated dimensional accuracy or repeatability is supplied.
An application-lab lighting demonstration, not a customer deployment or a qualified production inspection. Proposed camera, lens, fixture and scene spacing require a fresh trial. Source observations do not establish a defect-size limit, accuracy guarantee or production false-call rate.
From image contrast to a production decision
What to validate on your part
- 01
Choose the measured boundary
Identify the physical insert edge rather than a reflection or carrier feature.
- 02
Check the view cone
Verify the full field through the rear opening at the final part and light heights.
- 03
Calibrate if gauging
Use a reference artefact and repeated loading before defining a dimensional acceptance limit.
From the demo to your test bench
Parts in this setup
LightTested
LS-SDL-0005
Square shadowless light, 96 x 96 x 30 mm (LS-SDL-0005)
White square shadowless light named in the source; 96 × 96 × 30 mm housing with a printed 30 × 30 mm rear camera opening.
$339.00
In proposed setup
CameraOur pick
MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE)
Hikrobot MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE) 5 MP GigE area scan camera, IMX264, Gen 2 basic version, Mono, Without PoE
Proposed 5 MP monochrome global-shutter camera, 2448 × 2048 pixels at 3.45 µm, C-mount. The source camera is unidentified. This NPOE model requires separate power and does not support PoE.Not available in the United States. Available for delivery to other countries.
$819.00
In proposed setup
LensOur pick
LS-FFL-1454
16mm, F2.8, 1.1", C-mount, Macro lens (52 mm (-0.25X) to 546 mm (-0.03X)) (LS-FFL-1454)
16 mm C-mount macro lens. Its printed 0.1x / 152 mm working-distance pair gives a derived 84.46 × 70.66 mm field on the proposed camera. Confirm focus, coverage and fixture clearance.
$319.00
In proposed setup
Camera test stationOur pick
LS-MNT-0097
Camera stand with XZ adjustment and glass tray, height 600 mm (LS-MNT-0097)
600 mm column, 600 × 450 mm breadboard, glass tray and two lighting holders. Proposed bench fixture; actual load, travel, clamps, mounting fasteners and light clearance must be confirmed.
$629.00
In proposed setup
"Tested" identifies the part named in the source. "Our pick" is a proposed alternative or supporting part. Confirm colour, optics, controllers, power supplies, cables and mounting before ordering.
The set-up
| Source camera | Not identified in the source sheet |
|---|---|
| Camera and lens | Proposed catalog components |
| Proposed field | 84.46 × 70.66 mm derived from printed 0.1x magnification |
| Lens-to-part in proposed scene | 152 mm; printed working-distance pair |
| Mounting (proposed) | LS-MNT-0097 · catalog test station with two lighting holders |
Mount the optics with intent
The station is an optical test bench, with its two lighting holders included in the catalog listing. The 3D column and base follow the published height and footprint. Carriages, clamps and part supports are schematic: confirm camera screw pattern, lens support, light fasteners, permissible load and actual travel before ordering.
Complete the electrical system
Select a controller against the exact light voltage, drive mode and power, then confirm camera data/power/I/O cables and a suitable PC. These are not silently added to the proposed optical kit.
Build this system
Start from this setup, adapt it to your part.
The configurator opens with this study's camera, lens, light and station picked. Swap any part, check fit and price, then buy or ask for a quote.
Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Light envelopes and the station base/height use printed dimensions. Part shapes, brackets, holders, shielding and spacing are illustrative; they are not reconstructions of a source part or a complete mechanically validated assembly. Light paths explain the proposed arrangement and do not simulate optical performance. The proposed field is derived from the printed camera pixel dimensions and the stated lens magnification/working-distance pair, not measured from the source capture.
Metal parts and machining
Related case studies
Metal parts and machining
Spring-window appearance in a clutch plate
Use the spring-window pattern for appearance and prove mechanical function separately.Light in sourceLS-BKL-1302 · whiteExplore the study
Metal parts and machining
Cutting-bit end-face appearance
Prove the local end-face signal before assigning a wear or damage threshold.Light in sourceLS-SDL-0045 · blueExplore the study
Metal parts and machining
Scratch contrast on a machined cylinder
A curved surface needs a tested angular coverage plan.Proposed light housing (spec)440 × 50 × 117.13 mmExplore the study
Make the next trial specific.
Tell us the part size, smallest defect or tolerance, available working distance, material and line speed. Include what a good part and a reject look like.
About this case study: the photos and camera images come from the application laboratory of the maker of the lighting and optics we sell, imaged on the parts shown; your results depend on your part, camera and set-up. This is an application-lab study, not a LumaSpec customer deployment. Source figures are reported results; proposed components require a fresh trial. The 3D scene illustrates the arrangement and does not simulate imaging performance.