Line-scan textile inspection: a moving-web lighting concept

Start with a real lighting-lab capture, then explore a proposed line-scan station with a GigE camera, M42 lens, angled line light and adjustable test stand. Material motion builds the image one line at a time.

The lighting reveals the feature; synchronized material travel turns the line into a useful image.

3D illustration of the inspection setup: A line-scan station for textile surface defectsThe source camera capture shows the weave and a local raised or loose-fibre feature inside the original red annotation.Real camera capture
3D illustration of the arrangement · Explore it in 3D
  • Proposed camera2048 pixels · mono
  • Lens interfaceM42 × 1 · 12 mm flange
  • Light aperture300 × 18 mm
  • EvidenceLighting trial; system proposed

The challenge

The repeating weave is strong background texture. A raised fibre or surface irregularity needs lighting that separates it from the normal structure without confusing every yarn boundary with a defect.

A line-scan system also has to hold the moving surface at a controlled height and synchronize each acquired line with material travel. A good still image alone does not establish conveyor performance.

How it was solved

The application sheet identifies the white LS-4LINL300 and shows it tilted toward the surface. Its camera, lens, material speed and acquisition mode are not specified. The published image supports the lighting choice, not a claim that our proposed camera was tested.

The proposed Hikrobot MV-CL024-91GM uses 2048 × 7 µm pixels across the line, with GigE output and external line triggering. The LS-AF2524M-M42 lens covers a 29 mm image circle and has the same M42 × 1 mount and 12 mm flange back as the camera.

At the lens table’s 300 mm working distance and 0.078x magnification, the proposed width is about 183.8 mm (14.336 mm sensor length / 0.078). The narrow cyan fan in 3D is the acquired line; the material travels across it. Conveyor, rollers and encoder are illustrative motion requirements, not items in this quote.

Why it works

  1. 1

    An angled line light concentrates illumination across the acquired strip. Its angle changes how the surface sends direct reflections and scattered light into the lens.

  2. 2

    The lens must cover the whole sensor line. This proposal uses a 14.336 mm line and a 29 mm image circle; the matching mount and flange back avoid inserting an arbitrary adapter.

  3. 3

    Cross-web sampling is width / pixels. Along-travel sampling depends on motion per trigger, so an encoder or verified constant-speed synchronization is needed before interpreting image dimensions.

Lighting application-lab capture + proposed line-scan system

Evidence you can inspect

Visible in the images

The source camera capture shows the weave and a local raised or loose-fibre feature inside the original red annotation.

What the source reports

The source attributes the visible surface contrast to the named angled line light. It provides no line rate, transport speed, defect-size threshold or detection statistics.

How to use this evidence

A real lighting application with a proposed line-scan system design. No claim is made that the proposed camera, lens, motion system or processing algorithm produced this capture.

From image contrast to a production decision

What to validate on your part

  1. 01

    Prove surface contrast

    Test the worst acceptable surface and the smallest reject at multiple orientations and across the full illuminated width.

  2. 02

    Synchronize the image

    Set the line trigger from measured travel; verify the encoder ratio, camera input levels, line pitch and conveyor speed changes.

  3. 03

    Close the throughput budget

    Check exposure, light output, camera line rate and network/PC bandwidth together. Include dark-field noise, vibration and focus variation.

From the demo to your test bench

Parts in this setup

Build this system

"Tested" identifies the part named in the source. "Our pick" is a proposed alternative or supporting part. Confirm colour, optics, controllers, power supplies, cables and mounting before ordering.

The set-up

Camera (proposed)MV-CL024-91GM · 2048 pixels · 7 µm · GigE
Lens (proposed)LS-AF2524M-M42 · 25 mm · M42 × 1 · 12 mm flange
Illustrated working distance300 mm; confirm focus and required width
Derived width183.8 mm at the printed 0.078x magnification
IlluminationLS-4LINL300 · white · 24 V
Motion and controlConveyor and encoder integration to engineer; not included
Mounting (proposed)LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045 · camera test station with glass tray and two lighting holders

Mount the optics with intent

The station is an optical test bench, with its two lighting holders included in the catalog listing. The 3D column and base follow the published height and footprint. Carriages, clamps and part supports are schematic: confirm camera screw pattern, lens support, light fasteners, permissible load and actual travel before ordering. It supports the bench camera and trial light; it is not a conveyor gantry. Production mounting, transport and encoder integration are separate requirements.

Complete the electrical system

Select a controller against the exact light voltage, drive mode and power, then confirm camera data/power/I/O cables and a suitable PC. These are not silently added to the proposed optical kit.

Build this system

Start from this setup, adapt it to your part.

The configurator opens with this study's camera, lens, light and station picked. Swap any part, check fit and price, then buy or ask for a quote.

Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Lens and light envelopes use printed dimensions. The linked station uses its published base size and column height; carriage, brackets, fittings, parts and spacing are illustrative. Confirm load, travel, fasteners and clearances before ordering. Light paths explain the arrangement and do not simulate optical performance. Rollers and travel arrows represent external motion hardware, which is not included.