Envío en 1 días para artículos en stockGarantía mínima de 3 añosSoporte experto gratuito de ingenieros certificadosDescuentos por volumenNet 30 para empresas
ConfigurarConfigurar un sistema
ES
EnglishFrançaisEspañolDeutschItalianoPortuguêsNederlandsSvenska日本語한국어简体中文
Cotización
Inicio / Case studies / A line-scan station for metal surface scratches
Application study · Metal surfaces

Line-scan metal-scratch inspection: light, lens and motion

Start with a real lighting-lab capture, then explore a proposed line-scan station with a GigE camera, M42 lens, angled line light and adjustable test stand. Material motion builds the image one line at a time.

The lighting reveals the feature; synchronized material travel turns the line into a useful image.

  • Proposed camera2048 pixels · mono
  • Interfaz de lenteM42 × 1 · 12 mm flange
  • Light aperture300 × 18 mm
  • EvidenceLighting trial; system proposed
3D view of the inspection set-up: camera, lens, light and partDrag to rotate · scroll to zoom
3D illustration · real CAD where available
Walk through this setup 5 guided stops
From component to inspection

Understand each choice.

Choose a stop to frame the part in 3D and see why it belongs in this setup. The component notes and links remain available if 3D cannot load.

Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Lens and light envelopes use printed dimensions. The linked station uses its published base size and column height; carriage, brackets, fittings, parts and spacing are illustrative. Confirm load, travel, fasteners and clearances before ordering. Light paths explain the arrangement and do not simulate optical performance. Rollers and travel arrows represent external motion hardware, which is not included.

From the demo to your test bench

Build around the parts you can buy.

Explore each component, check its specifications and compare alternatives. The proposed quote includes the linked test station; its catalog listing includes two lighting holders.

Mount the optics with intent

The station is an optical test bench, with its two lighting holders included in the catalog listing. The 3D column and base follow the published height and footprint. Carriages, clamps and part supports are schematic: confirm camera screw pattern, lens support, light fasteners, permissible load and actual travel before ordering. It supports the bench camera and trial light; it is not a conveyor gantry. Production mounting, transport and encoder integration are separate requirements.

Configure the mounting station →

Complete the electrical system

Select a controller against the exact light voltage, drive mode and power, then confirm camera data/power/I/O cables and a suitable PC. These are not silently added to the proposed optical kit.

Lighting application-lab capture + proposed line-scan system

Evidence you can inspect

Visible in the images

The source capture shows bright scratches on the dark metal cover; the red rectangle is the original test annotation. This crop excludes unrelated printed markings on the cover.

What the source reports

The source attributes the visible surface contrast to the named angled line light. It provides no line rate, transport speed, defect-size threshold or detection statistics.

How to use this evidence

A real lighting application with a proposed line-scan system design. No claim is made that the proposed camera, lens, motion system or processing algorithm produced this capture.

What the camera saw

Cropped from the source test sheet; original test annotations are retained. Captures are not generated or enhanced. Drag the comparison slider or use the image buttons.

The source capture shows bright scratches on the dark metal cover; the red rectangle is the original test annotation. This crop excludes unrelated printed markings on the cover.
The source capture shows bright scratches on the dark metal cover; the red rectangle is the original test annotation. This crop excludes unrelated printed markings on the cover.

The challenge

Scratches on a reflective cover can disappear into the direct reflection. The light angle has to make their scattered light stand out against the surrounding metal.

A line-scan system also has to hold the moving surface at a controlled height and synchronize each acquired line with material travel. A good still image alone does not establish conveyor performance.

How it was solved

The application sheet identifies the white LS-4LINV300 and shows it tilted toward the surface. Its camera, lens, material speed and acquisition mode are not specified. The published image supports the lighting choice, not a claim that our proposed camera was tested.

The proposed Hikrobot MV-CL024-91GM uses 2048 × 7 µm pixels across the line, with GigE output and external line triggering. The LS-AF2524M-M42 lens covers a 29 mm image circle and has the same M42 × 1 mount and 12 mm flange back as the camera.

At the lens table’s 300 mm working distance and 0.078x magnification, the proposed width is about 183.8 mm (14.336 mm sensor length / 0.078). The narrow cyan fan in 3D is the acquired line; the material travels across it. Conveyor, rollers and encoder are illustrative motion requirements, not items in this quote.

Why it works

  1. 1

    An angled line light concentrates illumination across the acquired strip. Its angle changes how the surface sends direct reflections and scattered light into the lens.

  2. 2

    The lens must cover the whole sensor line. This proposal uses a 14.336 mm line and a 29 mm image circle; the matching mount and flange back avoid inserting an arbitrary adapter.

  3. 3

    Cross-web sampling is width / pixels. Along-travel sampling depends on motion per trigger, so an encoder or verified constant-speed synchronization is needed before interpreting image dimensions.

From image contrast to a production decision

What to validate on your part

A useful sample image is the starting point. These are the checks that turn the concept into a defensible inspection.

  1. 01

    Prove surface contrast

    Test the worst acceptable surface and the smallest reject at multiple orientations and across the full illuminated width.

  2. 02

    Synchronize the image

    Set the line trigger from measured travel; verify the encoder ratio, camera input levels, line pitch and conveyor speed changes.

  3. 03

    Close the throughput budget

    Check exposure, light output, camera line rate and network/PC bandwidth together. Include dark-field noise, vibration and focus variation.

Engineer the motion requirement

What line rate does your application need?

A planning calculation for the proposed 2048-pixel camera. Change the inspected width and transport speed to see square-pixel sampling. These are calculated requirements, not measured test results.

Across-web sampling
Required line rate
Exposure for 1 px travel

Sampling = width / 2048; line rate = speed / sampling.

The exposure value allows one pixel of motion blur; a stricter blur budget needs a shorter exposure. Verify light output, defect contrast, encoder timing, camera limits and network/PC capacity. Changing width requires revisiting lens magnification and working distance.

The set-up and the parts

Camera (proposed)MV-CL024-91GM · 2048 pixels · 7 µm · GigE
Lens (proposed)LS-AF2524M-M42 · 25 mm · M42 × 1 · 12 mm flange
Illustrated working distance300 mm; confirm focus and required width
Derived width183.8 mm at the printed 0.078x magnification
IluminaciónLS-4LINV300 · white · 24 V
Motion and controlConveyor and encoder integration to engineer; not included
Mounting (proposed)LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045 · camera test station with glass tray and two lighting holders

"Tested" identifies the part named in the source. "Our pick" is a proposed alternative or supporting part. The quote includes only cards marked "In proposed setup", with the quantities shown; other test arrangements are separate. Confirm colour, optics, controllers, power supplies, cables and mounting before ordering.

About this case study: the photos and camera images come from the application laboratory of the maker of the lighting and optics we sell, imaged on the parts shown; your results depend on your part, camera and set-up. This is an application-lab study, not a LumaSpec customer deployment. Source figures are reported results; proposed components require a fresh trial. The 3D scene illustrates the arrangement and does not simulate imaging performance.

More case studies

Start with your inspection requirement

Make the next trial specific.

Tell us the part size, smallest defect or tolerance, available working distance, material and line speed. Include what a good part and a reject look like.

Discuss your applicationConfigurar un sistema