MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE)View part & specifications →Browse camera options →Wafer positioning: use the circular edge and flat segment as visible geometry
The source image shows a bright circular wafer-like outline with a flat segment on its left side. Those features provide a localization trial, but the source supplies no wafer diameter or measured position error.
Use the visible edge geometry, then prove the coordinate accuracy on the actual wafer.
- Light in sourceLS-FCS150 · white
- EvidenceReal application-lab image
- Imaging kitCamera, lens and fixture proposed
- AcceptanceValidate on representative parts
Drag to rotate · scroll to zoomWalk through this setup 5 guided stops
Understand each choice.
Choose a stop to frame the part in 3D and see why it belongs in this setup. The component notes and links remain available if 3D cannot load.
MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE)
5 MP monochrome global-shutter camera proposed for a contrast trial. Confirm field, sampling, exposure and algorithm on the actual application.
LS-KF1628M-ML
Proposed 16 mm C-mount macro lens at its printed 0.1x magnification / 152 mm working-distance pair. The proposed 2448 × 2048 sensor with 3.45 µm pixels gives a derived 84.456 × 70.656 mm field; confirm focus, coverage and residual distortion on the real sample.
LS-FCS150
White LS-FCS150 explicitly named in the wafer-location example. Printed light-guide area 150 × 150 mm and outer size 190 × 190 × 10 mm.
LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045
600 mm column, 600 × 450 mm breadboard, XZ adjustment, glass tray and two lighting holders as listed. Proposed bench fixture; confirm loads, travel and camera/lens clamps.
Follow the contrast to the part.
Use the visible edge geometry, then prove the coordinate accuracy on the actual wafer.
Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Lens and light envelopes use printed dimensions. The linked station uses its published base size and column height; carriage, brackets, fittings, parts and spacing are illustrative. Confirm load, travel, fasteners and clearances before ordering. Light paths explain the arrangement and do not simulate optical performance. Representative part geometry is illustrative, not reconstructed inspection evidence. The specimen and lighting angle are representative, not dimensions or settings recovered from the source capture.
Build around the parts you can buy.
Explore each component, check its specifications and compare alternatives. The proposed quote includes the linked test station; its catalog listing includes two lighting holders.
MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE)View part & specifications →Browse camera options →
LS-KF1628M-MLView part & specifications →Browse imaging lens options →
LS-FCS150View part & specifications →Browse inspection light options →
LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045View part & specifications →Browse test station & mounts options →Mount the optics with intent
The station is an optical test bench, with its two lighting holders included in the catalog listing. The 3D column and base follow the published height and footprint. Carriages, clamps and part supports are schematic: confirm camera screw pattern, lens support, light fasteners, permissible load and actual travel before ordering.
Configure the mounting station →Complete the electrical system
Select a controller against the exact light voltage, drive mode and power, then confirm camera data/power/I/O cables and a suitable PC. These are not silently added to the proposed optical kit.
Evidence you can inspect
The circular boundary and a distinct left-side flat segment are visible.
The catalog captions wafer-location inspection under the white LS-FCS150.
Source wafer diameter, field, edge tolerance, algorithm, calibration and position error are unspecified. The representative 3D specimen is not a source dimension.
What the camera saw
Cropped from the source test sheet; original test annotations are retained. Captures are not generated or enhanced. Drag the comparison slider or use the image buttons.

The challenge
A circular outline alone does not provide a unique in-plane orientation; a flat segment can provide an additional reference.
Background reflections and edge cropping must not shift the location result.
How it was solved
The source identifies the white flat coaxial light and labels the example wafer location. The visible feature is a flat edge segment, not a documented notch.
The proposed 84.456 × 70.656 mm field is a bench-sample view. It is not a claim to image an unspecified production wafer completely; select another field and light area if the actual wafer is larger.
Why it works
- 1
The bright boundary and flat segment provide different geometric constraints for a localization algorithm to evaluate.
- 2
Feature visibility does not establish position accuracy, wafer-edge quality or suitability for a handling process.
What to validate on your part
A useful sample image is the starting point. These are the checks that turn the concept into a defensible inspection.
- 01
Verify the actual wafer geometry
Confirm diameter, flat or notch requirements and the field needed for the real handling operation.
- 02
Test edge visibility
Include accepted edge reflectivity, position, rotation and background variation.
- 03
Measure the coordinate result
Check calibration and localization error on independently known positions before guiding motion.
How many pixels cover your feature?
Compare feature coverage, camera pixel requirements and exposure using your own planning inputs. These are calculated planning values, not inspection results or an accuracy specification.
Editable planning scenario. Adjust these example inputs for your application; they are separate from the source test and 3D setup. Motion allowance and target coverage are starting points to validate, not acceptance limits. Pixel count starts from the proposed camera's catalog resolution.
Enter finite numbers in every field. Field width, feature width, target coverage, exposure and allowed motion must be greater than zero; horizontal pixel count must be a positive whole number; material speed may be zero. Use values within the supported numeric range if a calculation cannot be represented.
Formulas and assumptions
The field, feature, speed and exposure start with neutral example values. They are not taken from the source test or the 3D illustration. Allowed motion starts at an editable 0.5-pixel example; it is not a recommended acceptance limit. Target coverage starts at an editable 5-pixel example; it is not a recommended detection or measurement threshold. The horizontal pixel count starts from the catalog Resolution row for MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE). Use the effective width after cropping, binning or decimation if those modes are enabled.
- Object sampling (mm/px) = field width (mm) / horizontal pixels.
- Pixels across feature = feature width (mm) / object sampling (mm/px).
- Horizontal pixels for target = field width (mm) × target pixels across feature / feature width (mm), rounded up to a whole pixel.
- Motion (px) = speed (mm/s) × exposure (µs) / 1,000,000 / object sampling (mm/px).
- Exposure for allowed motion (µs) = allowed motion (px) × object sampling (mm/px) / speed (mm/s) × 1,000,000.
The exposure result is the maximum duration from this motion allowance alone. At zero speed, motion sets no exposure limit; the camera, lighting, saturation and other constraints still apply. A shorter exposure does not itself guarantee a reliable inspection.
Field width and feature width refer to the same object plane. The motion calculation assumes uniform linear motion parallel to the field-width direction and a single exposure. It does not model perspective, vibration, rolling-shutter distortion, diffraction, defocus or optical distortion. A strobe may change the effective exposure.
The target result is a horizontal sampling requirement, not a camera recommendation or a change to the selected camera. It uses the effective image width after cropping, binning or decimation and does not determine the vertical resolution or sensor size. Pixel coverage alone does not establish detectability or measurement accuracy. Validate contrast, lens performance, working distance, illumination, calibration, camera exposure limits and the inspection algorithm on representative parts. Changing field width does not change the 3D model or certify that the proposed lens can achieve that field.
The set-up and the parts
| Tested light | LS-FCS150, white |
|---|---|
| Source camera / lens | Not specified in the source image caption; proposed parts below |
| Proposed lens point | 0.1x at 152 mm, printed lens pair |
| Derived proposed field | 84.456 × 70.656 mm = sensor dimensions / 0.1x; not a source test field |
| Light-guide area (printed) | 150 × 150 mm |
| Housing (printed) | 190 × 190 × 10 mm |
| Whole-part coverage | Source diameter unknown; proposed field is for a representative bench specimen |
| Mounting (proposed) | LS-BT-XZ-G-6-6045; 600 mm column, 600 × 450 mm base, glass tray and two included lighting holders |

White LS-FCS150 explicitly named in the wafer-location example. Printed light-guide area 150 × 150 mm and outer size 190 × 190 × 10 mm.
$509.00In proposed setup
5 MP monochrome global-shutter camera proposed for a contrast trial. Confirm field, sampling, exposure and algorithm on the actual application.
$819.00In proposed setup
Proposed 16 mm C-mount macro lens at its printed 0.1x magnification / 152 mm working-distance pair. The proposed 2448 × 2048 sensor with 3.45 µm pixels gives a derived 84.456 × 70.656 mm field; confirm focus, coverage and residual distortion on the real sample.
$319.00In proposed setup
600 mm column, 600 × 450 mm breadboard, XZ adjustment, glass tray and two lighting holders as listed. Proposed bench fixture; confirm loads, travel and camera/lens clamps.
$359.00In proposed setup"Tested" identifies the part named in the source. "Our pick" is a proposed alternative or supporting part. The quote includes only cards marked "In proposed setup", with the quantities shown; other test arrangements are separate. Confirm colour, optics, controllers, power supplies, cables and mounting before ordering.
About this case study: the photos and camera images come from the application laboratory of the maker of the lighting and optics we sell, imaged on the parts shown; your results depend on your part, camera and set-up. This is an application-lab study, not a LumaSpec customer deployment. Source figures are reported results; proposed components require a fresh trial. The 3D scene illustrates the arrangement and does not simulate imaging performance.
More case studies


Spring and hook assembly under dome lighting
Make the attachment visible, then validate the mechanical requirement independently.
- MethodDiffuse white dome
- EvidenceReal application-lab capture


Front and back features on slender metal parts
Base orientation on a repeatable feature, not on brightness alone.
- MethodWhite polarized illumination
- EvidenceReal application-lab capture


Bread-piece outline and orientation
A usable outline is the first step; prove the handling task on real product variation.
- Light in sourceLS-2BS28238-RGBW · red
- EvidenceReal application-lab image
Make the next trial specific.
Tell us the part size, smallest defect or tolerance, available working distance, material and line speed. Include what a good part and a reject look like.
Discuss your applicationシステム構成