재고 상품 1일 내 배송최소 3년 보증공인 P.E.의 무료 전문 지원대량 구매 할인기업용 Net 30
구성시스템 구성
KO
EnglishFrançaisEspañolDeutschItalianoPortuguêsNederlandsSvenska日本語한국어简体中文
견적
홈 / Case studies / Gear teeth and bore contours
Application study · Precision machining

Gear contours in silhouette: isolate teeth, bore and openings

A blue backlight turns the gear into a dark outline against a bright field. The source image exposes the tooth perimeter, centre bore and circular openings together, providing a clear starting point for a contour-inspection trial.

A clean silhouette supports edge finding; calibration makes those edges useful for gauging.

  • MethodBlue transmitted backlight
  • EvidenceReal application-lab capture
  • SetupSource light identified; imaging kit proposed
  • AcceptanceValidate on your own parts
3D view of the inspection set-up: camera, lens, light and partDrag to rotate · scroll to zoom
3D illustration · real CAD where available
Walk through this setup 5 guided stops
From component to inspection

Understand each choice.

Choose a stop to frame the part in 3D and see why it belongs in this setup. The component notes and links remain available if 3D cannot load.

Camera and available lens CAD are published models. Lens and light envelopes use printed dimensions. The linked station uses its published base size and column height; carriage, brackets, fittings, parts and spacing are illustrative. Confirm load, travel, fasteners and clearances before ordering. Light paths explain the arrangement and do not simulate optical performance. Representative part geometry is illustrative, not reconstructed inspection evidence.

From the demo to your test bench

Build around the parts you can buy.

Explore each component, check its specifications and compare alternatives. The proposed quote includes the linked test station; its catalog listing includes two lighting holders.

Mount the optics with intent

The station is an optical test bench, with its two lighting holders included in the catalog listing. The 3D column and base follow the published height and footprint. Carriages, clamps and part supports are schematic: confirm camera screw pattern, lens support, light fasteners, permissible load and actual travel before ordering.

Configure the mounting station →

Complete the electrical system

Select a controller against the exact light voltage, drive mode and power, then confirm camera data/power/I/O cables and a suitable PC. These are not silently added to the proposed optical kit.

Lighting application-lab catalog capture

Evidence you can inspect

Visible in the images

The tooth perimeter, centre opening and circular holes are visible as high-contrast edges.

What the source reports

The source captions this trial as gear dimension inspection with LS-2FS300200 in blue; no numerical accuracy is stated.

How to use this evidence

A source imaging example, not proof of a calibrated gear-measurement system or a specified minimum tooth defect.

What the camera saw

Cropped from the source test sheet; original test annotations are retained. Captures are not generated or enhanced. Drag the comparison slider or use the image buttons.

The source blue-backlight capture shows the gear tooth outline, central bore and surrounding holes.
The source blue-backlight capture shows the gear tooth outline, central bore and surrounding holes.

The challenge

Bright metal finish can hide where a tooth ends when front lighting produces local glare.

A usable outline still needs distortion calibration, a stable part plane and a defined reject condition.

How it was solved

Place the gear between the blue LS-2FS300200 and the camera so the outside edge interrupts the illuminated field.

Use the proposed camera and macro lens to test contour extraction. For tight absolute tolerances, evaluate telecentric optics and a calibrated measurement process separately.

The proposed full-sensor field at 0.03x exceeds the light area. Use a centred 2400 × 1700 px software inspection crop (276 × 195.5 mm) within the illuminated region; the 3D viewing volume shows that inspection region. This does not require a camera hardware-ROI mode.

Why it works

  1. 1

    Transmission reduces dependence on the reflective finish of the gear face.

  2. 2

    The same silhouette can expose missing material and hole placement, but the supplied image is not a gauge repeatability study.

From image contrast to a production decision

What to validate on your part

A useful sample image is the starting point. These are the checks that turn the concept into a defensible inspection.

  1. 01

    Cover the tooth variation

    Include acceptable chamfers, burrs and finish variations alongside known damaged teeth.

  2. 02

    Calibrate at the part plane

    Use a traceable target and check scale and distortion across the full gear image.

  3. 03

    Repeat the placement

    Measure sensitivity to part height, tilt and rotation before defining dimensional limits.

Explore your inspection requirements

How many pixels cover your feature?

Compare feature coverage, camera pixel requirements and exposure using your own planning inputs. These are calculated planning values, not inspection results or an accuracy specification.

Editable planning scenario. Adjust these example inputs for your application; they are separate from the source test and 3D setup. Motion allowance and target coverage are starting points to validate, not acceptance limits. Pixel count starts from the proposed camera's catalog resolution.

Object sampling0.04085 mm/px
Pixels across feature12.24 px
Horizontal pixels for target1000 px
Motion during exposure0.2448 px
Exposure ceiling from motion204.2 µs
Formulas and assumptions

The field, feature, speed and exposure start with neutral example values. They are not taken from the source test or the 3D illustration. Allowed motion starts at an editable 0.5-pixel example; it is not a recommended acceptance limit. Target coverage starts at an editable 5-pixel example; it is not a recommended detection or measurement threshold. The horizontal pixel count starts from the catalog Resolution row for MV-CS050-10GM(NPOE). Use the effective width after cropping, binning or decimation if those modes are enabled.

  • Object sampling (mm/px) = field width (mm) / horizontal pixels.
  • Pixels across feature = feature width (mm) / object sampling (mm/px).
  • Horizontal pixels for target = field width (mm) × target pixels across feature / feature width (mm), rounded up to a whole pixel.
  • Motion (px) = speed (mm/s) × exposure (µs) / 1,000,000 / object sampling (mm/px).
  • Exposure for allowed motion (µs) = allowed motion (px) × object sampling (mm/px) / speed (mm/s) × 1,000,000.

The exposure result is the maximum duration from this motion allowance alone. At zero speed, motion sets no exposure limit; the camera, lighting, saturation and other constraints still apply. A shorter exposure does not itself guarantee a reliable inspection.

Field width and feature width refer to the same object plane. The motion calculation assumes uniform linear motion parallel to the field-width direction and a single exposure. It does not model perspective, vibration, rolling-shutter distortion, diffraction, defocus or optical distortion. A strobe may change the effective exposure.

The target result is a horizontal sampling requirement, not a camera recommendation or a change to the selected camera. It uses the effective image width after cropping, binning or decimation and does not determine the vertical resolution or sensor size. Pixel coverage alone does not establish detectability or measurement accuracy. Validate contrast, lens performance, working distance, illumination, calibration, camera exposure limits and the inspection algorithm on representative parts. Changing field width does not change the 3D model or certify that the proposed lens can achieve that field.

The set-up and the parts

조명Blue transmitted backlight
Test lightLS-2FS300200, blue
Emitting area (printed)300 × 200 mm
Camera and lensSource versions not identified; current proposed parts below
3D spacingIllustrative, to be confirmed on the sample
Derived proposed field281.52 × 235.52 mm = sensor dimensions / 0.03x; source field not supplied
Illuminated inspection ROI (proposed)2400 × 1700 px software crop = 276 × 195.5 mm at 0.03x; full sensor field extends beyond this light, so exclude the unilluminated margins
Mounting (proposed)LS-BT-XZ-G-8-6045; 800 mm column, 600 × 450 mm base, glass tray and two light holders

"Tested" identifies the part named in the source. "Our pick" is a proposed alternative or supporting part. The quote includes only cards marked "In proposed setup", with the quantities shown; other test arrangements are separate. Confirm colour, optics, controllers, power supplies, cables and mounting before ordering.

About this case study: the photos and camera images come from the application laboratory of the maker of the lighting and optics we sell, imaged on the parts shown; your results depend on your part, camera and set-up. This is an application-lab study, not a LumaSpec customer deployment. Source figures are reported results; proposed components require a fresh trial. The 3D scene illustrates the arrangement and does not simulate imaging performance.

More case studies

Start with your inspection requirement

Make the next trial specific.

Tell us the part size, smallest defect or tolerance, available working distance, material and line speed. Include what a good part and a reject look like.

Discuss your application시스템 구성